🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives laid to rest in graves at risk from coastal erosion say that a lack of decision on how best to address the problem is causing them unnecessary distress concerning the final resting places of their departed family.

A Looming Danger to Historic Graveyards

The council have singled out three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being consumed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the situation sets out a series of possible actions, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and reburying them in safer sites. Authorities maintain it is for local people to decide how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It upsets me. They intended this to be their last home, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Projections suggest at least a portion of one graveyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner remembered a childhood visit to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the sea, along with its church and graveyard.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that the deceased will just get washed out to the ocean. They won’t. People will take bones as mementos and go plundering graves looking for treasures. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Peril

Along the shoreline lies the burial plot of a former paratrooper killed while working overseas. His mother expressed she lost sleep after learning her son’s final plot might one day be relocated.

“It does trouble me to think this won’t be his permanent resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant site to visit.”

She believes, new interments should cease but says it is too soon to disturb existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Seeking Answers and Clarity

The lack of agreement over the timing and method to tackle the problem has resulted in grieving relatives feeling frustrated and anxious.

Some are calling for additional coastal protections to slow the unavoidable loss and to allow funerals to proceed for now. Different voices argue the time for relocation is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager said the graveyards were under the care of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is up to them to decide the direction to take. Our role is here to help support them through that journey with communities.”

It was also stated there was time to consider all the options. “We are talking many years before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should be done yet. It requires good local conversations to discover the right solutions for each community.”

The possibility of losing the historic sites was described as one of “profound sorrow for the local community,” but faith leaders also referenced a doctrine in resurrection, providing a theological viewpoint on the temporal disappearance of sacred ground.