Moscow Demands Substantial Amount in Damages against Clearing House Regarding Seized Assets
The Russian central bank has stated it is claiming damages valued at $230 billion against the securities depository Euroclear. This action constitutes a clear warning from the Kremlin against plans to use frozen Russian sovereign funds to support Ukraine.
The Substantial Demand
Based on accounts in Russian news outlets, the central bank filed a lawsuit last week for roughly 18 trillion roubles. This amount is equivalent to the aforementioned $230 billion claim.
European Union officials will decide in the coming days on a plan to use around €210 billion in immobilized Russian state funds. This scheme involves providing Ukraine with a large loan to finance its defence and financial stability.
The vast majority of these funds, totaling €185 billion, reside at the Euroclear clearing house in Brussels. This institution serves as the primary keeper for the Russian immobilised financial reserves.
Divergent Legal Views
EU officials have maintained that their proposal is on solid legal ground. They argue rests on the fact that ownership of the sovereign wealth still belongs to Russia, even though it was immobilized in European jurisdictions following the 2022 military offensive of Ukraine.
The Russian government, however, has labeled any use of the assets as theft. Authorities have threatened retaliatory measures, including seizing EU corporate holdings within Russia.
The head of Russia's sovereign wealth fund, a figure who has taken on a key position in peace negotiations, wrote on a social media platform that Russia "will win in court" and regain its funds. He warned that the EU, the euro, and Euroclear "will suffer" from the proposal.
Geopolitical Maneuvering
With statements interpreted as an effort to drive a wedge between Europe and the United States, Dmitriev characterized the proposal as "a vicious attack on the right to ownership and the international reserves system established by the United States."
Euroclear declined to provide a statement on the new legal action. The institution has previously noted it is contending with more than 100 lawsuits in Russian jurisdictions.
Legal Hurdles Ahead
Although judges in EU countries are not expected to enforce rulings from Russian courts, analysts anticipate Moscow to seek enforcement in countries with stronger ties to the Kremlin.
"Russian monetary authorities could try to implement a Russian court's decision against Euroclear in countries such as China, Hong Kong, the UAE, Kazakhstan, and other friendly states, provided that such holdings can be identified," stated a legal expert from an international firm.
EU Countermeasures
EU officials indicated they are developing steps to discourage other nations from aiding any Russian legal action against European companies. They are also designing safeguards to shield EU countries with assets in Russia from what they term "illegal expropriation."
How the Funding Would Work
Under the complex scheme, the EU would issue an first €90 billion loan to Ukraine, backed by the cash generated from the frozen assets at Euroclear. Critically, Russia's legal claim on the underlying funds would remain unaffected.
Ukraine would solely be required to repay the money if and when Russia consented to pay compensation for the immense damage inflicted during the ongoing conflict.
Alternative Proposals
The Belgian government, backed by Italy, Bulgaria, and Malta, has urged the EU to consider an alternative approach for funding Ukraine. This involves common EU debt issuance to fund a loan, backed by unallocated funds within the EU budget.
This alternative move, however, requires full agreement among all 27 EU countries. The Hungarian government, considered aligned with the Kremlin, has previously signaled its objection.
Commenting on Monday, the EU foreign policy chief, a senior official, said the proposed loan scheme as "the strongest option" for aiding Ukraine. "This mechanism is secured against the Russian frozen assets, meaning it doesn't come from our public funds, which is equally important," she stated. "It also delivers a clear message that when you cause all this damage to another country, you have to pay for the reparations."